Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tijani Fahie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:18, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Tijani Fahie

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Prod removed citing now-defunct WP:NFOOTY. Subject does not have sufficient (or, indeed, really any) coverage in reliable sources to be considered notable per WP:GNG. There's only mentions as part of routine coverage of the team:. agt x 16:47, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Caribbean.  agt x  16:47, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. Despite being a modern day athlete from an english speaking country, I was unable to find anything significant on him during a search. Seems to be playing in the Saint Kitts and Nevis second tier league. His lone international cap (substitute on 83rd minute against Andorra) doesn't seem to have given him any additional coverage. Alvaldi (talk) 17:07, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:29, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:33, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 11:54, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep passes GNG.--Ortizesp (talk) 16:56, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Which source convinces you of that? agt x  17:32, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - I can only find trivial coverage in match reports, statistics databases and a national team selection announcement. Fails GNG. Jogurney (talk) 18:53, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per nom. I concur that the subject lacks the WP:SIGCOV required for a standalone article. GauchoDude (talk) 10:19, 4 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.