Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiku Weds Sheru


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 23:44, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Tiku Weds Sheru

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

non notable subject. Draft Already exist. Blackfishes (talk) 14:59, 21 December 2021 (UTC) Relisting comment: Ignore the weird draft comment - does this meet WP:GNG? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 00:31, 29 December 2021 (UTC) Relisting comment: See prior relisting comment. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee  //  have a ☕️ //  beans  // 22:16, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Blackfishes (talk) 14:59, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Blackfishes (talk) 14:59, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: Existence of draft can't be the reason of deletion. Princepratap1234 (talk) 15:26, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: meets WP:GNG. Danski454 (talk) 15:37, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: Principal photography has begun so passes WP:NFF plus meets WP:GNG as well, and the existing draft can be deleted. ManaliJain (talk) 15:57, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - The article does not provide how general notability is satisfied, and film notability is not satisfied. The RFC that would have established interim notability for movies that are in principal photography failed as No Consensus, so that the 2008 language is still applicable, and that language only says that such movies are notable if they pass general notability, which this one does not.  Robert McClenon (talk) 02:50, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment - If both a draft and an article exist, either the draft should be redirected or the article should be deleted. In this case the article should be deleted.  Drafts should not be deleted on account of article acceptance, but redirected.  Robert McClenon (talk) 02:52, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep passes GNG and NFF, decent amount of coverage. AryKun (talk) 13:02, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
 * weak keep - nothing really indicates how the production is actually notable, but there are multiple reports of the start of production, so in the strictest sense of multiple sources meaning notable, it seems to squeak by. -2pou (talk) 02:52, 9 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.