Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiller's Rule

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD✉ 23:46, 3 August 2005 (UTC)

Tiller's Rule
A minor in-joke on Slashdot. Joyous (talk) 19:34, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with Slashdot if it's a notable enough joke, otherwise Delete. Y0u (Y0ur talk page) (Y0ur contributions) 19:36, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. &mdash; Fingers-of-Pyrex 20:15, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Sufficiently minor that I've never encountered it in several years of Slashdot, which I think makes it nn. Agentsoo 22:20, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, I've read /. since last millenium and I've never noticed Tiller's Rule. Is it because I don't read comments rated "minus-one"?  Having read the full article, I still don't find a reason to dispute the "importance" tag.  I didn't post a "Barno's Theory" article here, and that started in Wikipedia's VfD.  ("Barno's Theory is that any sound or unsound idea can be portrayed as a pyramid shape.")  Barno 01:23, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Even if everything claimed in the article were true, utterly non-notable. Quale 02:54, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nn joke. JamesBurns 09:53, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nn and badly expressed.--Maustrauser 10:01, 27 July 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.