Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tillicum Centre


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to  Victoria, British Columbia. j⚛e deckertalk 01:29, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Tillicum Centre

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

NN 50+ store, 472,590 sq. ft mall. Was PRODed, but PROD was removed. Epeefleche (talk) 03:37, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 12:16, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 12:16, 12 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Speedy merge Delete Fails WP:V.  Sourcing is so lacking that the article requires a complete rewrite to satisfy WP:V. I wasn't able to wp:verify the size of the centre.  I looked at Google books and news.google.com/newspapers.  Unscintillating (talk) 22:53, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Changing !vote to speedy merge. Northamerica1000 has found a few sources and added them to the article, although not a source to verify the size of the mall.  He supports a merge to Victoria, British Columbia, and Epeefleche has initiated the merge, here.  So there is no longer an argument for deletion, nor is there any support for a keep.  Unscintillating (talk) 01:18, 17 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Selective merge to Victoria, British Columbia. Coverage in reliable sources exists, but it's primarily local (see WP:AUD). NorthAmerica1000 23:21, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I could see a redirect. But nothing to merge. The text is all uncited and challenged. Any new material could be created and cited properly at the target. Epeefleche (talk) 23:51, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I've added citations from reliable sources to the article, which better-qualifies the merge. NorthAmerica1000 00:29, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
 * They're now in the target (where as I pointed out they could have been created in the first place). Epeefleche (talk) 00:36, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.