Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tilt (novel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 16:32, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Tilt (novel

 * – ( View AfD View log )


 * Delete per WP:BK. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 00:05, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 21 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete The article mainly consists of a quote from the author's website. Promotional. Notability far from established. Book does not exist. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 02:58, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Ellen Hopkins. The book might eventually gain notability when it gets released (and probably will, given the reception for Hopkins' other books), but there's not enough out there at present to support having an article for it at this time. It wouldn't hurt to have it just redirect to the author's page for the time being since I can see this being typed in as a search topic by random people. There's no sources out there that could be used as reliable sources, but there's more than enough buzz out there to justify the idea that people would use this as a search term.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 11:49, 21 January 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * Delete per wp:crystalball. Redirecting isn't useful as no one is likely to look for a book that isn't out, and the title is borked anyway, with a missing ) mark.  Dennis Brown (talk) 21:09, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.