Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Andrews (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:28, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Tim Andrews
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Previously deleted in 2008, so may satisfy the CSD G4 requirements, but I'll let others who can see the old article make that call. I don't think the blog controversy makes much difference to his notability, which is minimal in my opinion. The-Pope (talk) 15:31, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:BIO. Joe Chill (talk) 16:26, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG, simply no notability. Claritas § 16:37, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:43, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:43, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BIO, WP:N. Supposed 'controversy' is so minor that it isn't even necessary to bring up WP:BLP1E. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  17:05, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete falls a long way short of WP:GNG, WP:BIO.............. Nuttah (talk) 08:09, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:BIO. miracleworker5263 (talk) 03:13, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.