Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Barnett (porn star)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 00:04, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Tim Barnett (porn star)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails to meet WP:PORNBIO, Article was speedy deleted, but then restored yesterday. JoshuaD1991 (talk) 15:26, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:52, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * KEEP.. I would normally of said delete if it was a "normal" porn star, but since he is also known as a serial rapist and their are newspaper articles on him I would say to keep it. He seams notable. Callelinea (talk) 19:46, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - As a potential BLP issue, are there any reliable sources that connect Tim Barnett to Brad Wagner, suspected serial rapist who committed suicide? Never mind, plenty on Google News Morbidthoughts (talk) 21:15, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Plus, BLP doesn't apply to dead people. But your point is still important. BDP's (neologism?) should be well-sourced too. David in DC (talk) 11:27, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notorious enough to be notable in my book. --Quartermaster (talk) 21:46, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep WP:PORNBIO irrelevant. Generally notable as accused serial rapist who killed himself in jail.  Sufficient Reliable Sources. David in DC (talk) 03:28, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per media coverage. However the formatting of the links needs to be adjusted as they do not indicate that they are links to ABC News. There is bias against Internet news sources on Wikipedia, so if the labelling were changed to ABC, that might alleviate potential concerns over "unreliable sources". 23skidoo (talk) 13:25, 29 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.