Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Bilecki


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Mr.Z-man 02:20, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Tim Bilecki

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional article that fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:AUTHOR. Logical Cowboy (talk) 07:59, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:16, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:16, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:16, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:16, 2 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete G11 - article is clearly intended as an advertisement for the law agency and promotion for his writing work with the biography acting as nothing but a WP:COATRACK. - The Bushranger One ping only 08:56, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete I went through each source. Many can be discarded as primary sources or no mentions of Bilecki at all. Some are very trivial mentions of a single quote buried in the article. A couple quote him a bunch of times. However in these, they are about court cases and clients, which is normal lawyer activity, like being a journalist on TV, it's part of the job be seen publicly. Need to see more in depth coverage about the lawyer. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 20:32, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.