Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Brunero


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus -- Samir  धर्म 04:34, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Tim Brunero
Big Brother housemate, per precident. -- 9  cds (talk) 00:44, 19 June 2006 (UTC) Delete per precedent. Nonnotable housemate. May be notable in the future based on his journalism career but does not seem so currently- Peripitus (Talk) 01:43, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I Resign I created the Tim Brunero article, and wikipedia is a farce. All FOUR of the Big Brother articles I created are subject to deletion. The ultimate irony is that Big_Brother_Australia_series_5, has as its only reference BehindbigBrother.com , but my article on BehindBigBrother.com http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Behind_Big_Brother_Australia  was deleted on advice of a Frenchman???!!! So I decided to find out how corrupt the deletion process is, picked an article at random & I got it deleted http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Louis_Dorman . I have better things to do with my life than creating articles, having them deleted, and dealing with wikipedia village idiots. Gtoomey 11:47, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
 * What are you resigning from? Ans e ll  12:01, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - sigh as I change my opinion - Capitalistroadster is correct - there are quite enough media + parliment mentions and a plethora of articles etc... Enough for notability. --Peripitus (Talk) 02:33, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above.  Rockpock e  t  03:31, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. &mdash; Khoikhoi 03:45, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. 77 Australia media references to this guy relating to his career as a journalist as well as a Foreign Aid activist. He seems to be notable enough outside Big Brother. Capitalistroadster 04:23, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   -- Capitalistroadster 04:24, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, he seems to be notable outside Big Brother. His post-BB activities should be expanded upon, however. --Coredesat 06:10, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WikiProject consensus stated. Other details mentioned aren't notable IMO. -Ambuj Saxena (talk) 06:14, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep He is a public Australian figure, before and after BB he has had notability, though after the show his civil rights activities are more visible. Not a reason to delete. Ans e ll  06:35, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep As per Ansell, but also because the Big Brother articles only have information on the housemates if it's relevant to their time in the house; and generally not their time before or much long after. -- JD talkemail 12:48, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. I think his stature outside Big Brother would allow for his inclusion here.  --Roisterer 12:37, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect nn and article does not meet WP:BIO. --Wisd e n17 13:22, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect as above-- Ch ild zy ( Talk 19:47, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect -- has acheived anything of note since leaving the series. - Longhair 21:30, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable outside of being a BB contestant. -- Chuq 23:07, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per above Cyclone49 04:59, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect, as usual. Just zis Guy you know? 11:44, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect as above. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 14:47, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Capitalistroadster. There's seems to be blanket nomination for every contestant of this particular BB by the same nom, which completely ignores what the individual person may be notable for, particularly for things outside the show.  I note the nomination text is *exactly* the same as another nomination, despite substantial differences in the subjects.  Before doing a nomination, it is important to read the individual article, and see what specific reasons there are for deletion or retention.  Now, if the nom feels the other stuff isn't adequate, than please say so, and explain why, but please don't present a copy/paste nomination rationale. --Rob 05:12, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Capitalistroadster. There's seems to be blanket nomination for every contestant of this particular BB by the same nom, which completely ignores what the individual person may be notable for, particularly for things outside the show.  I note the nomination text is *exactly* the same as another nomination, despite substantial differences in the subjects.  Before doing a nomination, it is important to read the individual article, and see what specific reasons there are for deletion or retention.  Now, if the nom feels the other stuff isn't adequate, than please say so, and explain why, but please don't present a copy/paste nomination rationale. --Rob 05:12, 21 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment The precedent referenced in the nomination has been challenged by multiple users and as such is not strong enough to be used as the only nomination condition. Ans e ll  06:45, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, as per Ansell. Grey Shadow 21:26, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep -- I@n &equiv; talk 03:51, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. While most of the ex-Big Brother housemates are not notable, Brunero is one of the few to have some lingering prominence, due to his involvement in various social justice issues. Rebecca 14:00, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.