Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Busse


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  13:30, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Tim Busse

 * – ( View AfD View log )

PROD contested with the rationale "Mayor of a city with a population of over 85,000 people. Currently of importance to the city.".

Non-notable mayor of a small city. Fails WP:NPOL; newspapers.com has some local news coverage, but nothing that really provides WP:SIGCOV beyond WP:LOCAL, so also fails WP:GNG. Curbon7 (talk) 03:12, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 03:12, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 03:12, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
 * Delete. While Bloomington MN appears to be large enough that a substantive and well-sourced article about a mayor could potentially be kept, it is not large or important enough that its mayors would simply be presumed notable just because you write and primary source a short blurb that barely goes any further than "he was a mayor who existed". The notability test for mayors is not passed simply by writing a few stray tidbits of biographical trivia; it is passed by writing and reliably sourcing (meaning media coverage, not the city's own self-published website about itself) a substantive article about his political impact: specific things he accomplished, specific projects he spearheaded, specific effects he had on the development of the city, and on and so forth. But that's not what this article is. Bearcat (talk) 19:05, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  08:40, 22 September 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  09:57, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NPOL requires that local elected officials meet WP:GNG. This subject has several passing mentions in various news sources, but lacks the significant coverage required by GNG. The few articles actually focused on the subject is WP:ROUTINE local election coverage (e.g. and ), and therefore fails the notability standard. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:38, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - As per nom. Gentleman wiki (talk) 20:30, 30 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.