Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Gay


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Closed early per WP:SNOW. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 23:52, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Tim Gay

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Directory listing for a state-level politician. Not the slightest indication of the reason for a biography, nor a single source attesting to anything at all other than membership in a provincial legislative body. WP:DIRECTORY applies here. CalendarWatcher (talk) 19:07, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets WP:POLITICIAN, first level subnational office. Ray  Talk 19:40, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  --  Ray  Talk 19:40, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Longstanding policy is that state legislators are per se notable. Kestenbaum (talk) 20:00, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  20:16, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep As shown above, politicians of the level Tim Gay is at are notable enough for a article. --CF90 (talk) 20:20, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:POLITICIAN. Duly-elected members of a national, state or provincial legislature are notable. Bearcat (talk) 01:17, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - Meets WP:POLITICIAN as a verifiable member of the Nebraska Legislature.  Enigma msg  05:39, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.