Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Gilmore


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 12:44, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Tim Gilmore

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Article on college professor/poet seems to fall short on both WP:PROF and WP:GNG notability guidelines. In addition, the editor who wrote the article is User:Timgilmore. B.Wind (talk) 20:08, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete  Only one item listed on worldCat, a book of self-published poems. . The usual way writers of short works become notable is when they are included in standard anthologies or win awards, or eventually comprise a book that is widely held. He does not seem to have yet done any of these, so I think the judgment is not yet notable.  No prejudice against an article if he does achieve further.  DGG ( talk ) 21:37, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —David Eppstein (talk) 19:29, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:53, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Appears to fail WP:PROF - gscholar didn't show much. I believe DGG addressed the authorship aspect above. I see no other claims to notability in the article. Ray  Talk 21:38, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.