Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Leunig


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 20:23, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Tim Leunig

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Don't think this man meets notability criteria, and combined with lack of citations would put this forward for deletion Trumpkinius (talk) 20:09, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Trumpkinius (talk) 20:09, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 23:20, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 23:20, 23 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep. Citations are OK to pass WP:Prof for this field. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:36, 24 August 2020 (UTC).
 * Weak keep. Considering his field, he does not have many citations; but adding to it that he received a prize for his article "Time is money: a re-assessment of the passenger social savings from Victorian British railways", I believe it is enough impact to fulfill WP:NACADEMIC. Walwal20 talk ▾ contribs 20:06, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep – seems notable. I've added one citation in the article also. – Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 11:24, 30 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.