Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Livingston


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  11:10, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Tim Livingston

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable journalist,fails to pass WP:GNG Padavalam🌂   ►  17:08, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Padavalam🌂   ►  17:08, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Padavalam🌂   ►  17:08, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions.  Padavalam🌂   ►  17:08, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep Article does have a number of sources. – Cupper 52 Discuss! 17:32, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:40, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete While the podcast may be notable (and I'm not saying it is), there is not enough in-depth coverage on Livingston to pass WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 18:30, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm with on this, although I think the podcast has enough independent coverage to be notable on its own. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:16, 16 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.