Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Moffat

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. CDC  (talk)  23:05, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Tim Moffat
Delete, vanity. Was marked for speedy but doesn't meet conditions. FreplySpang (talk) 23:28, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't see why this can't be speedy. It's just a longer version of "Tim is a great guy."  I don't think we should give credit for verbosity.  Vanity is vanity.  --Xcali 23:29, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * And until we change the rules, vanity is not a criterion for speedy delete. I wish it were, but I'm not the majority. Denni &#9775; 03:47, 2005 Jun 7 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete its just vanity. Falphin 23:56, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete rampant vanity. --Etacar11 00:03, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Why are we having to debate this?? - delete of course --Doc (?) 00:11, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Oh, man. Tim Moffat has memorized every line in Return of the Jedi!  Well, I guess we're just gonna hafta delete the "kickass kid". Jacob1207 01:25, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.  Please do not edit this page .