Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Rix


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:52, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Tim Rix

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails to establish notability, no valid references. Apparently the only claim of notability is that he had played as an uncredited extra in some movies and TV series, and appeared in music videos. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 03:53, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete As per nominator.PRehse (talk) 08:25, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  19:52, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  19:53, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  19:53, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  19:53, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  So Why  06:36, 27 June 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  So Why  07:22, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: No notability, members of NCT and Wanna One are more notable than him. Tibbydibby (talk) 22:44, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:NACTOR as having no significant roles; an uncredited extra in some films does not establish notability. Also, three of the four references don't cite the information they're supposed to. --Kbabej (talk) 22:06, 9 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.