Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timberlane Middle School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Hopewell Valley Regional School District.  — fetch ·  comms   02:16, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Timberlane Middle School

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable school. I tried redirecting to the town per normal schools below high-school level (this is grades 6-8), but was reverted. Bongo  matic  13:58, 7 September 2010 (UTC)


 * I don't think this is a non-notable school. Look at the categories under "middle schools in NJ".  All of them have a Wikipedia page, so you would have to delete those too.  other notable middle schools in the area such as Montgomery Upper Middle School have a article.  This is a well-written page about a good school district, and does not meet any of the deletion criteria -tom8866
 * While not dispositive, WP:OUTCOMES has this to say: "Most elementary and middle schools that don't source a clear claim to notability are now getting merged or redirected in AfD." Bongo  matic  14:25, 7 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:57, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:57, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Hopewell Valley Regional School District per the usual procedure. Deor (talk) 00:31, 8 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Fair point. How about I add a small bit about this school under the Hopewell Valley Central High School page. -Tom8866


 * Merge/Redirect per Dior. And based on what tom8866 says, there are a lot more middle schools in New Jersey that also need to be merged/redirected - except for the rare school that achieves enough independent coverage to rank as generally notable. --MelanieN (talk) 20:14, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.