Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Unproductive and not funny. Please use userspace rather than actual encyclopedia processes for attempts at humor. See WP:AN.  Sandstein  18:12, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Time

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article does not define its topic. Borock (talk) 05:55, 1 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep We have all the time in the world. Bulldog73 talk da contribs  go rando 06:00, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Time Enough at Last? --MuZemike 15:21, 1 April 2012 (UTC)


 * ??? Which reason at WP:DEL do you think applies? --JimWae (talk) 06:39, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * maybe... this reason?--Müdigkeit (talk) 06:50, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak keep as fictional concept in Back to the Future.—What a pro (talk, contribs) is on fire.  07:49, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep, urgently. It turns into a pumpkin at midnight, or do I mean midday today in this case? Suggest Speedy Snowball close before time runs out, snow melts, etc. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:47, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Time (magazine) as what I am going to assume, without any investigation or actual sensible reason, is the most common use of the term. postdlf (talk) 15:46, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.