Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time's Up!


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Nomination withdrawn (Non-admin closure) Pastor Theo (talk) 03:04, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Time's Up!
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Request for sources has been in since Aug '07 and "wikyfi" has been in since Oct '08. Not encyclopedic and looks like self promotion
 * Keep: It's not a very good article, but the organization is amply notable: see Google News results for "time's up"+environment+"new york". Lots of heavy-hitter news sources there. They need adding to the article (which I can do, if this survives AfD), but it shouldn't be binned. Gonzonoir (talk) 11:25, 22 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - Multiple references such as the New York Times - Christian Science Monitor - Seattle Times and other 3rd party - creditable and reliable sources, as shown here. I'll start adding references over the next week.  Any and all are welcomed to participate. ShoesssS Talk 14:17, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep but scrap all bits of the article that don't relate to notable events, and remove all the peacock terms from what's left. If necessary, reduce to a stub. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 14:46, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Much of this article should be scrapped but still keep-worthy. Letsdrinktea (talk) 17:44, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

After reading your comments it looks like improving is better than deleting. I might have been a bit rash in calling for complete removal. Can I remove the AfD or is that bad form?


 * If you simply state you're withdrawing the AfD, someone will close it for you. Don't delete the AfD entirely because it needs to stay as a reference. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 07:32, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the info. I am withdrawing my request for deletion.Cptnono (talk) 19:20, 23 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.