Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time Rate


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete Nacon kantari  04:01, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Time Rate
It has no scientific content þħɥʂıɕıʄʈʝɘɖı 03:39, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete for using an apostrophe in possessive "its". Either that or WP:NOR. In other news, "All that exist is imploding to a seemingly singularity" wouldn't make a bad T-shirt. Melchoir 04:53, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:NOR. --Coredesat talk 06:09, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete for failing WP:NOR. If it is not then the article is merely an suggestion and there is no proper reference in it anyays. --WinHunter (talk) 08:46, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research. —Quarl (talk) 2006-06-29 08:52Z 
 * Delete per Melchoir. This type of thing has to cite its sources to assert its credibility. --DaveG12345 09:01, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOR. Black-Velvet  18:15, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.