Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time and Again (TV program)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of programs broadcast by MSNBC. Considering there was a rebuttal of the new sources posted, and the same user who posted them also mentioned Redirect as a solution, consensus is clear. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 (talk) 13:42, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Time and Again (TV program)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article has been unsourced since 2009(!), so for almost 10 years. I've looked and I can find no reliable secondary source coverage of this documentary TV program. (Even the MSNBC website seems not to mention it...) Thus, this appears to be a non-notable documentary TV program (there are quite a lot of these on TV...) which does not meet WP:GNG. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:33, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:34, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:34, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to List of programs broadcast by MSNBC It was one of the original MSNBC series in the age before cable news became what it is now and notable for that. But it was used mainly to fill time with NBC News archival programming, not much more, and once rolling news coverage happened, it just disappeared into the ether. I could probably say there's full episodes on YouTube, but that's automatically a non-notable source since they're definitely not network-uploaded (going back to the network's site circa 2000 via the Wayback would see it mentioned there, but since video footage would either be RealMedia or WMV, it's virtually unusable to a modern viewer).  Nate  • ( chatter ) 08:42, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:07, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. -- PATH SLOPU (Talk) 14:00, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. -- PATH SLOPU (Talk) 14:00, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:08, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:23, 30 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Redirect or Keep - there is some sourcing out there to establish this and satisfy WP:TVSHOW, but I'm fine with a redirect until someone wants to expand it beyond an unreferenced stub. -- Netoholic @  17:45, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Look to be incidental mentions, not "in depth" coverage. I agree that a redirect is the best option in this case – I don't think there will ever be enough to justify a standalone article for this particular show. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 18:04, 3 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.