Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timed expiry date


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 14:48, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Timed expiry date

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unreferenced article about a term, for which I can find no documentary support of significance. The technical descriptions do not ring true. Article is not verifiable. Peripitus (Talk) 10:52, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 * This, and timed destruction by the same author(s), appear to be attempts to write about what is actually known as planned obsolescence without, apparently, knowing before writing either what it's actually called or what it really is. Uncle G (talk) 14:19, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:52, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:52, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Can't find any sources to show that this is a real concept. Nwlaw63 (talk) 20:33, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per all. (Or possibly merge content with planned obsolescence.) Does not appear to be notable as a term. OSbornarfcontributionatoration 00:36, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.