Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeless Beauty


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 14:23, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Timeless Beauty

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This title doesn't seem to have much coverage in reliable sources, thus making it fail our general notability guidelines, which help set a standard for verifiablility. RileyBugz 会話投稿記録 11:58, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per nom for this is a title given by a website, an obvious fancruft. Moreover, sources are pitiful and severely lacking, failing WP:GNG. Ernestchuajiasheng (talk) 12:16, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Baby miss  fortune 12:21, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Baby miss  fortune 12:22, 13 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Agree with the nomination. Non notable "title" awarded by a non-notable website. noq (talk) 14:14, 13 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.