Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeless Time & Expense


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Notability not established. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 07:28, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Timeless Time & Expense

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Two overlapping articles that both fail WP:NSOFT/WP:GNG. Might be G11able, but while it has all the hallmarks of paid editing the tone isn't so egregious as to make G11 clear. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 02:52, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Also nominated:
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  Rhododendrites  talk  \\ 02:57, 19 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as simply nothing yet to suggest a better notable article aside from the reviews, I would still wait for better coverage later. SwisterTwister   talk  22:19, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:32, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:57, 26 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Not enough good sources, doesn't meet requirements ( WP:NSOFT ). ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 15:07, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Philafrenzy (talk) 08:52, 4 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.