Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of Syracuse, Sicily


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Based on the expansion the article has undergone during the AFD, consensus here is to keep. (non-admin closure) Steven   Crossin  12:26, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Timeline of Syracuse, Sicily

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

not notable enough, largely useless as it is covered in Syracuse,_Sicily The Verified Cactus 100% 20:04, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge  with - Syracuse,_SicilyDeathlibrarian (talk) 01:44, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  04:06, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  04:06, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  04:06, 24 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete I don't see anything useful here. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 04:12, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. More content added recently, including info translated from the Italian version of the timeline. Additional content forthcoming shortly. -- M2545 (talk) 11:00, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
 * More content added here -- M2545 (talk) 17:32, 25 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment I recently found out that the article is part of a series of timelines for Italian cities, rather than a standalone kind of thing. I'm not sure which side I'm on now, as I feel that it could be improved to a quality similar to Timeline_of_the_city_of_Rome. The Verified Cactus 100% 15:08, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Has grown to a substantial length, and timelines are valid formats for articles. If a standalone article on the history of Syracuse existed, merge might be a possibility, but merging to Syracuse is inappropriate because of the length of both articles. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:39, 26 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.