Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of the 2004 United States presidential election controversy and irregularities


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. GRBerry 21:01, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Timeline of the 2004 United States presidential election controversy and irregularities
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Neither an article nor a proper timeline. It seems to be a time-sorted selective collection of newspaper article title. Violates WP:NOT 2.4 (not a mirror or a repository of links, images, or media files) and possibly 2.9 (not an indiscriminate collection of information) We also already have a full article on this subject. Rmhermen 23:41, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with the nom's rationale re: WP:NOT vios. Useful info, etc., but it's really not encyclopedic. Keep, and ensure proper VfD circumstances  Update: if this VfD is not getting appropriate attention as a result of some technical issue (as User:Mandsford below suggests) I won't support deletion under these circumstances. -- User:RyanFreisling @ 23:46, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Appears to violate WP:NOT as discussed above. Stifle (talk) 19:37, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Apparently, if you make a nomination after 2330 GMT, it ends up as the last entry of articles of deletion rather than up at the top. Not surprisingly, very little discussion on this article.  Despite the shorthand writing style, it's sourced and could be translated into a narrative.  The 2004 U.S. presidential election was fairly controversial, but benefitted by a favorable comparison to the one before it.  Mandsford 13:30, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I didn't perhaps make this quite clear but we already have the article: 2004 U.S. presidential election controversy and irregularities. This is something else. Rmhermen 15:14, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Violates WP:NOT and is covered elsewhere. Violates WP:OR as well.  --DHeyward 13:59, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, article is little more than a link dump.  Pablo   Talk  |  Contributions  01:38, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom, violates WP:NOT Kudret abi Talk 06:35, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, yet another trivial link dump, also violates WP:NOT as cited above. Burntsauce 17:40, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Violates WP:NOT and is covered elsewhere. --Evb-wiki 20:12, 5 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.