Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timelive


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:20, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Timelive

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

UPE article created in violation of the TOU by a CU confirmed sock. Should have been G5 eligible, but contested by a good faith editor. Notability is irrelevant.  DGG ( talk ) 16:22, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as obvious spam and UPE, and thus a TOU violation. Technically the account is only blocked for two weeks now on vote staking, but SPIs are ongoing and it meets all the behavioral signs of a UPE sock. Notability is irrelevant, but it doesn't meet that either: the sourcing is either trivial or PR churn. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:27, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete for reasons stated above by TonyBalloni and DGG. Also fails CORPDEPTH and ORGIND. Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 18:25, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep I put this on the talk page too because I wasn't sure which was best. I know this software; I have read about it and know several people who use it. I don't have a conflict of interest as I don't work for the company but I am happy to work on an edit to meet CORPDEPTH if you'll allow me the time52.173.74.241 (talk) 11:37, 11 November 2017 (UTC) — 52.173.74.241 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:57, 12 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:PROMO and as WP:GNG fail. A nn software package with trivial reviews / WP:SPIP sources. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:56, 16 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.