Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timo Preece


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I ignored the sockpuppet !vote. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:26, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Timo Preece

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Lengthy (apparently self) promotional article. No hint of notability per guidelines. agt x 12:05, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:59, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I also cannot find any WP:RS covering the subject. Does not appear to meet WP:GNG. Pyrrho the Skipper (talk) 16:23, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. I agree it’s tone is self-promotional, reads like WP:RESUME. Non-notable individual with insufficient sourcing to meet the standard for an article. Fails WP:GNG, WP:BASIC. NiklausGerard (talk) 23:59, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Self-promotion with most sources being his own website. No songs that charted, no awards won. Oaktree b (talk) 00:00, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Looks like a promotion. Notability is not establishing from available references. DMySon (talk) 11:09, 30 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.