Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timo Puustinen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — Yashtalk stalk 00:40, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Timo Puustinen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not enough sources and presumably not notable. Friy Man talk 17:36, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - lots of news hits (though I assume the chicken farmer is somebody else). Sorry, don't speak Finnish well enough to be able to improve the article. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  18:24, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:56, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:56, 4 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately, the nomination statement really does sound like there was a presumption of non-notability, based on the sources on the article. But that's really not how this is supposed to work. After a look at the Gnews results -- with the aid of Google Translate -- he does appear to meet WP:GNG. Keep Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:06, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Solid references in RS match GNG. More, the nomination was clearly flawed (as hinted at above), as obviously no WP:BEFORE was even attempted. &mdash;  O Fortuna!   Imperatrix mundi.  13:01, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - Passes WP:GNG and WP:FILMMAKER. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   18:36, 7 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.