Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy's House


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Snowball Delete. In addition, user appears to have requested deletion CSD G7. Lankiveil (speak to me) 02:13, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Timothy's House
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable structure/residence. (author removed prod) -- BeezHive (talk|contribs) 05:50, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I find no hits for this on Google (found a restaurant in Ontario though!). Pinkadelica (talk) 06:21, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete it's a user page which I've already asked him to cut down. It doesn't belong in the mainspace. The Rambling Man (talk) 06:52, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - part non-notable structure, part vanity page, part complete nonsense. - fchd (talk) 06:57, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment The page was moved by the original author to Timothy House (for non-apparent reasons). -- BeezHive (talk|contribs) 07:00, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Non-notable house. Should not be userfied because Wp is not a free host. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 07:18, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. This is a vanity piece based on the creator's live page and just needs to go. Wildhartlivie (talk) 09:24, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete and salt per WP:IAR if need be. It's basically vandalism (though probably not in the strictest meaning of the word). If you need "rules" we got failure of WP:N and WP:V for starters. Jasynnash2 (talk) 10:41, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete of course, and if User:Timothyhouse1 creates such a page again, he should be given a uw-create3 or 4 warning. - Face 12:43, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete If this goes on, don't take things a chance, as don't tell people a house as notability. Information get's isn't. I don't know if this article has notability. Timothyhouse1 13:12, 5 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy DeleteG11 and pass the salt — Clear violation of WP:NOT, WP:COI, WP:CRUFT, WP:VANITY, and WP:SPAM. User has been trying to shirk the deletion process by moving the article during an AfD as well as removing AfD templates. MuZemike (talk) 13:38, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I think technically we can it based on the above "votes" by the author anyway. Though it may be prudent for someone to make sure they are legit first. Jasynnash2 (talk) 13:43, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I think the snowball clause can be applied at any rate, as deletion seems unanimous and I don't think it's likely that someone will come along and argue in favor of keeping the article. -- BeezHive (talk|contribs) 19:50, 5 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete author requests deletion. RockManQ (talk) 21:21, 5 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.