Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy Armstrong (economist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 00:57, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Timothy Armstrong (economist)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Assistant professor, no publications (yet?) according to his own CV, not notable per WP:NACADEMICS. bender235 (talk) 16:16, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 21 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. For assistant professors, even at Ivy League schools, it is usually WP:TOOSOON for them to have accumulated the impact needed to pass WP:PROF. I see no sign that this case is an exception. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:29, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. WAAAAAAY WP:TOOSOON. Hardly any publications yet, he'd better get busy. LaMona (talk) 19:45, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.