Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy Brosnan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  Delete Mandsford 23:28, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Timothy Brosnan

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unverified biography whose main function seems to have been advertising for the company founded by the subject, Creative Hammer. Note the history for the main editors, where you'll find Creativehamedia. Anyway, a blatant COI and some spamming is not a sufficient reason for deletion, but the apparent lack of notability is: I can find nothing through Google News and Google Books about this subject--and nothing is offered in the article. Drmies (talk) 02:21, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Additional COI note: see this edit summary by the article's main editor, who identifies himself here as Tim Brosnan. Drmies (talk) 02:22, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Agreed. For someone who has done all these things, there is, apparently, no newspaper or other reporting of them. It makes me wonder how real they are.. . Jim - Jameslwoodward (talk to me • contribs)  12:22, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:57, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:33, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:33, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Unverifiable at best. Edward321 (talk) 13:21, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - A bunch of references have been added that appear to assert a degree of notability. Off2riorob (talk) 18:21, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. Notability is not demonstrated. The so-called references are mostly just a bibliography. Even the Romanian references are not about Brosnan but are based in part on one of his columns. Jimmy Pitt   talk  20:00, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - I think there is enough notability to warrant a wiki article. Off2riorob (talk) 20:03, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. I am forced to agree with Jimmy Pitt. All those references appear to be a bibliography of his work, nothing about the subject himself. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:01, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.