Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy Druckrey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 16:30, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Timothy Druckrey

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There is no indication in the article that this person is notable per the standards of WP:ACADEMIC or WP:AUTHOR. There are no secondary sources to establish notability included in the article. Ahecht ( TALK PAGE ) 15:37, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 11 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. There is a high bar to passing WP:PROF as a book editor rather than a writer — high citations alone aren't good enough to convince me, because the notability for that should more likely go to the people who wrote the content. I'd need instead to see book reviews that specifically pointed to the editing of the collection as being worth noting. And in this case the citation counts aren't even particularly high. I don't see any other evidence of passing WP:PROF or WP:GNG, either. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:18, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 16:17, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

 Delete. Notability not sufficient. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:23, 27 March 2014 (UTC).
 * Delete. Here I am following David Eppstein regarding the editor category. Likewise, his curating would put him in the WP:CREATIVE category, which seems a tough one indeed for that role, and I don't see that he passes.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 14:24, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.