Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy Hodge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedily deleted as non-notable --Stephen 05:33, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Timothy Hodge

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable singer, fails WP:MUSIC. Despite the article's assertions of numerous TV appearances, there is no IMDB entry for either "Timothy W. Hodge" or "Timothy Hodge." No reliable sources crop up, and the only hits pertaining to this artist (there's a modestly known R&B singer by the same name, if a good bit older) are his own website, this article, various Wiki mirrors and a couple self-posting music sites. Fails WP:V. (taken from RGTraynor's exemplary nomination at this article's previous speedily closed AFD - WP:Articles for deletion/Timothy W Hodge) nancy  talk 17:04, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete..... again. Still fails notability per WP:MUSIC & WP:ENTERTAINER.    Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 17:15, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Ultra-Mega-Super Delete Another uunsourced page, most likely created to dodge this. I have tried to talk to the persons involved, but they don't seem to get it. Beeblbrox (talk) 17:46, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete A non-notable singer as evidenced by the lack of reliable sources. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:01, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, and this time let's not jump to trying to speedy it. That way we can cut straight to db-g4 if it comes around again. - Vianello (talk) 19:08, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The other article was speedied because the author blanked it out, feeling it was unneeded now that this page is here, so i think a better idea is to pass around the WP:SALT. Beeblbrox (talk) 19:29, 27 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete and salt - as above, the other version was only speeded because it was blanked. See also the creator's other pieces of walled garden about various Hodges etc. Wheelchair Epidemic (talk) 20:26, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete and Salt Whilst noting my G7 speedy on the last one was totally in process. However I agree that this debate potentialy can be used as a G4 if the article turns up under another title. Pedro : Chat  20:52, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The two editors responsible for all these articles are clogging up my talk page with garbage about why this shouldn't be deleted, yet they apparently refuse to actually add sources or participate in the discussion here.... Beeblbrox (talk) 21:16, 27 July 2008 (UTC)21:16, 27 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:00, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete and salt the earth: This article, and its related ones, have been repeatedly CSDed, AfDed and prodded over the last couple days. They've been speedied and recreated, speedied again and recreated with slight variations on the names.  The two creating accounts, User:Sunpop  and User:Daisy404, have repeatedly spammed several users (I've had about a dozen letters from them myself) with the repeated riff "Do not delete" and "you do the research."  They have been near-completely unresponsive to instructions to review the appropriate policies, guidelines and notability criteria, nor have they responded to suggestions that if they are finding as many valid sources as they claim, putting those sources in the articles would be a good idea.  None of the subjects in any of these articles are notable, and perhaps salting will get the editors to hold still long enough to listen.    RGTraynor  23:15, 27 July 2008 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Symbol delete vote.svg|15px]] Delete — & salt. Again, no evidence of notability. doña macy [talk] 00:02, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
 * And now the articles creators have been blocked as sockpuppets. Beeblbrox (talk) 05:22, 28 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.