Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy Walton (lawyer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. The Bushranger One ping only 02:31, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Timothy Walton (lawyer)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability-tagged for more than a year. Only ref is a listing in a state bar membership roll. Questionable claim for notability. ORPHAN. Quick search of GNews turns up nothing. Written by anon SPA whose 4th of 5 total edits was to create this article. Agricola44 (talk) 16:14, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:56, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:56, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:56, 2 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment (no !vote at the moment); I'm actually leaning toward delete, but there's some coverage of him at and . I've not convinced myself it's enough, but others might feel differently. TJRC (talk) 22:38, 3 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete there's not enough here to meet WP:ANYBIO or WP:GNG. The main reference is the California state bar's database, and the links TJRC found aren't enough for me. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 20:09, 8 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.