Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tina (music)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:39, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Tina (music)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)


 * See talk page. "So specialised and obscure it should not be on wikipedia at all" says the man who named it. "The only other place where any information about the Tina may be found is on an external webpage that i created" says the article creator. Delete says I. Jfire (talk) 05:56, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Fast Delete. Hoax. Not found in three reputable and comprehensive musical terms dictionaries. (e.g. ) Sensiblekid (talk) 09:31, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per the person who named it (see talk page). Sting au  Buzz Me...   12:54, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong delete as something made up in school one day. Seems a bit too extended to fall under a speedy criterion, though. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 17:39, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. A simple google search reveals that this is a fairly recently coined term invented by the Just Intonation researchers who needed it. It has value in its limited context. It is not a hoax. A better term is original research in this case by credible researchers who have published in the past. If they do publish work that uses the term that might be a good time to add this article. Right now it is more in the nature of a proposed term. On the other hand neither speedy nor strong seem justified. This is not an offensive article or even an incorrect one. There is no intent to mislead. No harm is caused by its existence. What's the rush? User:zenpickle 2 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.