Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tina O'Darby


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was BLP delete. Although only two people contributed to the discussion, the only credible source--an Arizona Republic article--mentioned the subject only in passing. This article was poorly sourced from the start, and no other sources have been added that could outweigh the serious BLP issues. BLP is very explicit on this--poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed without discussion. Blueboy96 17:35, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Tina O'Darby
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I speedily deleted this as CSD on the premise that the lack of notability did not outweigh the serious WP:BLP concerns. Unfortunately, this was declined for speedy deletion earlier, so here we are. There is not sufficient assertion of notability to begin with, IMO. Not sufficiently sourced. And needs deletion under BLP. Notoriety only is asserted. If it exists, it is not sufficient for notability  Dloh  cierekim  19:58, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy Delete: no credible sources - almost certainly a hoax created by someone who knows someone by that name. Not notable even if not a hoax. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:58, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Actually, two of the links support this not being a hoax. I do not dispute the information as presented. I just don't see the BLP issue being outweighed by notability. Dloh  cierekim  21:39, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Well the sources "support" the article, but they have no credibility, IMO. Two free websites and a picture of a news article (which simply lists her a being arrested as a suspect) that can't be verified at azcentral.com. In any case, clearly not a notable person if she has only appeared in one local newspaper article.--ThaddeusB (talk) 22:29, 17 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  02:23, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:03, 18 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.