Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ting Li


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 16:38, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Ting Li

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Orphaned page, probably written by the person herself. Runner-ups at this and that dissertation awards does not meet WP:NACADEMICS and there is nothing to indicate that her publications are highly-cited, but I admit I'm not an expert. At least I believe the page ought to be scrutinized. Timmyshin (talk) 15:45, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 25 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep – Work is cited thousands of times, as shown here . Meets the criteria underNotability (academics).  ShoesssS Talk 17:23, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
 * "Thousands of times"? I checked the first five pages of your Google Scholar search and I'm yet to see her name anywhere. Please provide evidence. Timmyshin (talk) 19:58, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
 * TK LI. ShoesssS Talk 12:52, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Per Google Scholar, her highest-cited article is only cited 21 times (5 of which has her as an author). Timmyshin (talk) 20:06, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The confusion is that Shoessss found the citation statistics of a medical geneticist at Indiana University that just happens to have the exact same name as the subject of this article. David Eppstein found the correct citation statistics and they're about average for an academic of her standing. Agricola44 (talk) 15:25, 26 September 2014 (UTC).


 * Delete. Citations per Google scholar profile are well below threshold for WP:PROF and there is no evidence of passing any of the other WP:PROF criteria. WP:TOOSOON. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:15, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per David Eppstein findings. The "Keep" above is based on mistaken citation metrics for a different person of the same name. Agricola44 (talk) 15:25, 26 September 2014 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.