Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tinkerbell (dog) 2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep, as per the prior discussion closed just 7 hours ago. The prior AFD was not a "no consensus" as Alkivar labelled it. Merger is a matter for the articles' talk pages. Uncle G 18:43, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Tinkerbell (dog)
the previous afd was closed prematurely at 8 Keep to 8 Merge, relisting to avoid a no consensus result. ALKIVAR &trade; 16:21, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * It's either going to be kept or merged, nobody's trying to delete. So I don't see that this is a good candidate for Afd, personally.  I'd say merge, but this is a matter for the talk page IMO.  Friday (talk) 16:27, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * You don't close votes early to avoid an unwanted outcome. There were 16 votes for keeping or merging and none for deletion. This isn't articles for merging - this is articles for deletion. Speedy Keep per previous afd and discuss any merging on the articles talk page per standard policy.--God of War 16:54, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. Was not closed prematurely - had been going 6 days and, while that was enough to close it, furthermore no-one had made any comments for about 36 hours . No chance of deletion and this is not the place to discuss merging articles. --Malthusian (talk) 17:00, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Just last night I saw a gift pack of Hilton perfume that included a little beanie-type version of tinkerbell as a bonus item.  Exposure in (presumably) many thousands of stores worldwide, in conjunction with appearing on a top-rated network TV series for several years now, equals notability, even if one happens to be a dog.  Note, of course, that merging doesn't require any sort of AfD result to do, so if anyone feels really strongly that it should be merged, then go ahead.  Full disclosure: I've created a dog article in the past, and may have opinions which may impair full objectivity regarding dog-related deletions. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  17:54, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep per God of War and my vote the last time around. --SarekOfVulcan 18:36, 18 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.