Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tinni


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Golam Faruque Ovi. After merge is complete, may be converted into a disambiguation page. (non-admin closure) buidhe 00:11, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Tinni

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable murder victim. According to WP:BIO1E, the general rule is to cover the event, not the person. There is no article about the crime, which received only routine news coverage and does not meet the inclusion criteria for events. Wikipedia is not news. Worldbruce (talk) 14:25, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 14:25, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 14:25, 31 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom and fails WP:GNG clearly. Abishe (talk) 14:31, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:13, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:13, 31 May 2020 (UTC)


 * comment. The death of Tinni gets some ongoing coverage as a controversial unsolved murder case with a notable and hard-to-prosecute suspect . As a person however, Tinni is a BIO1E of an actress who was just starting out. Even the press coverage the crime is mostly about the difficulty of bringing the alleged perpetrator to justice.  There is no depth to sustain a biographical article. • Gene93k (talk) 16:33, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect she has no notability on her own other than her murder. What is on her page can be merged with the accused's page.  Donaldd23 (talk) 21:07, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to page of accused. Plausible search term. No need to delete. pburka (talk) 23:07, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm fine with merge and redirect if that's the ultimate consensus, but note that the dead Syeda Tania Mahbub Tinni arguably isn't the primary topic of the mononym. Another model and actress, Srabosti Dutta Tinni, has commonly gone by Tinni for years, as seen in . If a page is preserved at Tinni, it should be a redirect to the notable and living person. If we want something useful to pop up in the search box when a reader seeking the dead Tinni types the plausible search term "Tinni", we could create a redirect from "Death of Tinni" or "Murder of Tinni" (not sure what the convention is on naming such events) to the accused. Or, if we think there is no primary topic, the mononym should be a disambiguation page that links to the living person and to the accused. --Worldbruce (talk) 01:06, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
 * A disambiguation link or page makes sense. pburka (talk) 17:57, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
 * A disambiguation page strikes a reasonable balance. Reasonable search term for multiple subjects, while a merge to the BLP of the suspect puts undue weight on not-yet-proven accusations. • Gene93k (talk) 18:43, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   07:04, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment I think there is consensus that the page should not exist in its current form. Considering the discussion above about it being a plausible search term, would it be agreeable to you for any reliably sourced content to be merged to Golam Faruque Ovi, and for the page Tinni to become a disambiguation page? Something along the lines of:

Tinni may refer to:
 * Srabosti Dutta Tinni (active 2004-2013), Bangladeshi actress and model
 * Syeda Tania Mahbub Tinni (died 2002), Bangladeshi actress and model allegedly murdered by Golam Faruque Ovi
 * My reading of the discussion so far is that such a course of action would be supported by, , , and myself. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:04, 13 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.