Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TinyCA


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Whereas it might not be spam, notability has not been demonstrated by reliable sources, and therefore the consensus is for deletion. May be recreated if sources have been found.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:09, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

TinyCA

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not shown to be notable. Kind of advertisy. --L235 (talk) Ping when replying 23:55, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Oops, I should've PRODed, my bad. I've been gone for too long.. --L235 (talk) Ping when replying 23:56, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:56, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:56, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Keep: As it's a free tool, I'm not seeing a spam angle here. (And I like obscure thingy articles.)--Раціональне анархіст (talk) 07:19, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - software article of unclear notability, lacking independent RS coverage. a search did not turn up any other significant RS coverage, just incidental mentions in how-to articles.Dialectric (talk) 12:51, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:13, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable, lack of substantial coverage in reliable sources, and likely spam (and yes, free things certainly can be spammed and often are). Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  01:53, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per everyone above, IMHO it does look spammy so will have to say Delete. – Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 03:03, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.