Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tipton academy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 17:45, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Tipton academy

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

This article concerns an apparently non-notable school, and cites no third-party reliable sources. John254 00:37, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - reads as an advert. Does not satisfy the organisation notability requirements or the proposed (and now marked rejected) WP:SCHOOL policy. The line Because Tipton is a new school it is not yet on the approved list of SLM Financial schools on their website says it all - they are too new to have elicited much press ... the only notability I can find is that they are expensive ( USD$3,495 monthly after the first month) - Peripitus (Talk) 00:50, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No notibility shown or found. Fails WP:ORG and WP:CORP (since WP:SCHOOL doesnt apply).--155.144.251.120 02:55, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No attempt to comply with WP:ORG. No assertion of notability. No independent sources (no sources at all other than the organization's web site). --Shirahadasha 03:11, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete in the absence of any assertion of notability. JCO312 03:39, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:ORG IronDuke  04:38, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, no assertion of notability, unverifiable, WP:ORG. Terence Ong 10:32, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable; fails (as others have said) WP:ORG as well as WP:CORP. Also, it reads as if this were their website, which is definitely a bad thing in an encyclopedia setting. -- tennis man    sign here!  21:18, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. Very non-notable; definitely looks like ad or violates WP:NOT. Ronbo76 00:09, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. Reads like an advert. DaveApter 15:00, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of notability. WMMartin 14:36, 26 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.