Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tirk Recordings


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus, complicated by the rewrite.  Daniel  04:52, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Tirk Recordings

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable record label run by non-notable man full of peacock terms with no sources Corvus cornix 22:21, 8 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep - label with hundreds of artists including notable artists we have articles on here. It reads like an ad at present, but we should be encouraging creator to improve the article instead of WP:BITEing with hair-triger deletion noms.  BenB4 22:30, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Reads like a press release. No prejudice towards recreation, though.  Blueboy96 22:32, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I intend to re-write it and the newbie's other ad-like articles, as I did for Secondfest. Please do not speedy unless I haven't gotten to it by 10 July. BenB4 22:56, 8 July 2007 (UTC)


 * No vote - Maybe the major copy-edit will make it more notable although it failed WP:V before.--JForget 23:26, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Conditional Keep pending cleanup; BenB4's comments indicate that the record label is probably notable. Chubbles 01:52, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, just one trivial mention on Google News Archive (in an article about amato distribution, which is probably notable). --Dhartung | Talk 04:29, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep/Merge, I have refactored the article and started to tidy up Sav Remzi. If not keep, this article can be merged with newly formed Music Rights Collective. John Vandenberg 09:15, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 09:15, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep pending user:BenB4's re-write. Some notable acts. Precious Roy 10:10, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks to whomever re-wrote it before it got to it. Note to closer:  please compare nominated version to current version. BenB4 17:27, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Article is in better shape now but no sources have been added. Additionally I can't find any on various news/reference searches. --W.marsh 21:27, 14 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.