Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tirona station


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There is consensus not to keep these. The "merge" or "redirect" proposals cannot at this time be implemented because the proposed target article(s) do not exist yet. Once they do, any desired redirects can be created. I cannot imagine that there will be any great desire to merge these texts, which are all of the form of "X is a proposed station at Y street serving Z destinations", into any summary articles.  Sandstein  21:13, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Tirona station

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Same reason as BGC station deletion; this line has been "planned" for many many years, but it keeps getting canceled/changed; it's a dead project atm. Same deletion request applies to all the stations listed in Manila Light Rail Transit System Line 6 save Niog station. truflip99 (talk) 21:07, 28 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. truflip99 (talk) 21:10, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages because same reason as above:

--truflip99 (talk) 21:16, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:17, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

I am adding more nominations for planned lines 4 and 8, same reason as above:

--truflip99 (talk) 21:37, 28 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete all: Definitely WP:TOOSOON, at least. ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 05:52, 29 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Redirect all to the Rapid transit in the Greater Manila Area that is currently under discussion at WT:TAMBAY. While this parent article has not been made, i suggest putting this AfD on hold as we still dont have a place to hold important information on these proposed stations and lines.--RioHondo (talk) 07:50, 29 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete the lot, and really all of the rest of the articles on these proposed lines. The whole thing is an extended offense against WP:CRYSTAL and most likely WP:UNDUE. Mangoe (talk) 11:55, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge. Same with RioHondo, article for Metro Manila/Greater Manila Area rapid transit needs to be created before we proceed with this. -TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 20:24, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect per (redirect target article/s is/are up for more experienced editors here). Delete and redirect all articles of nonexistent and proposed stations for proposed and under-construction lines with less than 10% completed progress, except for stations under construction . JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:55, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete per nom.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 02:40, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge to a single article about the proposals. There is useful encyclopaedic information (assuming it is reliably sourced, I haven't checked), but not enough to sustain individual articles. As always in this situation, the best thing to do is to merge that information into a broader article. Deletion would not harm the project by unnecessarily removing that encyclopaedic information. Thryduulf (talk) 21:04, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge to 1 article. SportsOlympic (talk) 10:44, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect each station to the article about the (proposed) line it's on, for example: Tirona, Imus, Daang Hari, Salitran, Congressional Avenue, Governor's Drive to Manila Light Rail Transit System Line 6.19:31, 6 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.