Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tita Vendia vase


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:24, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Tita Vendia vase

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Article has only one reference and not notable per WP:GNG, not tagged as a stub or categorized. Could be a notable article if improvements are made; but as it stands, violates notability guidelines. - η y χ  α μ ς  11:10, 5 June 2010 (UTC)  η y χ  α μ ς  11:10, 5 June 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Yup, it needs one more reliable source to pass the GNG. Here is that source.— S Marshall  T/C 13:38, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 * comment. Tita Vendia has been mentioned in the History of the Ancient World that we studied in the fifth grade, but it was back in the USSR, and not a word about vase, only of the inscription. I'll see if there's more sources on the vase. This English source calls it wine container, FWIW. Gone digging. East of Borschov (talk) 18:49, 5 June 2010 (UTC) P.S. Truckload of sources, more or less certain dating, give me a few days. East of Borschov (talk) 18:56, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep. Notability has been clearly demonstrated by East of Borschov since this nomination was made. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:08, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.