Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Titanic: The Animated Movie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 06:36, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Titanic: The Animated Movie

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  AfD statistics)

Only references are IMDb, a personal website and TVTropes. I have searched under various titles, including the Italian title, but have not been able to find any reliable third-party sources regarding this film. As amusingly bad as this whole movie is, it just doesn't meet WP:N and WP:NOTFILM in any way — the writer is a red link with no notable credits on IMDb; the film didn't win any awards; nobody even saw fit to review it besides the Nostalgia Critic, but I don't think he counts towards notability here. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 23:27, 10 December 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 02:16, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:45, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom's fine research. Plenty of coverage on forums, blogs, database listings and such, but sadly no reliable sources. PC78 (talk) 12:28, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete per nomination - lack of independent reliable sources sufficient to establish notability. MikeWazowski (talk) 04:30, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.