Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Titanic 2. Jack's Back


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. DS 02:34, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Titanic 2. Jack's Back
I'm pretty sure this is a hoax. If not, it's an unsubstantiated rumor, as admitted by the article. Deproded by author without explanation. eaolson 23:21, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I haven't heard in the media of a Titanic II. Then if this article would of exist, I would have heard it lots of times and entertainment news. So without checking Google, I am definitely sure it is a hoax.--JForget 23:40, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh and even if it's not a hoax, it would have failed WP:CRYSTAL, based on the not sure if it will be released bit. That is crystalballing at it's best.--JForget 23:42, 24 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Things like this make me wish that "Patent Nonsense" meant more than just mangling language. There really should be a speedy criteria for obvious nonsense.  Resolute 23:54, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete "A sequel to James Cameron’s 1997 blockbuster in which Leonardo DiCaprio’s character Jack Dawson is found frozen among the wreckage of the Titanic, where he is brought back to the surface and thawed. He then escapes and is on the run from authorities in modern day New York City." If it made anyone think twice, then it's done it's job as a hoax. Mandsford 00:01, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No reputable sources to verify that there is in fact a "Titanic II" coming out. -- Hdt 83     Chat 00:23, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete This IS a hoax based on this (admittedly) funny video. AniMate 00:50, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to re-cut trailer, although that looks to be a huge honking violation of WP:NOT and WP:EL. --Dhartung | Talk 01:15, 25 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.