Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Titanium Indulgence


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —  Aitias  // discussion 01:44, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Titanium Indulgence

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Self published, non-notable book Blowdart | talk 13:56, 1 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.   —Orderinchaos 15:49, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The book has been added as it is of cultural significance to the people of South Western Australia, particularly those in the titanium refinement industry (which is a large part of the economy), and because it has been recognised as such by local media such as the Bunbury Mail and Golden West Network. The book is notable by virtue, particularly to people in all of Australia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cobra12au (talk • contribs) 2009-01-01 14:20:03
 * Notability is not fame, nor importance, nor significance. Sources! Sources! Sources! Uncle G (talk) 16:21, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Doesn't show notability per WP:BK. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 14:50, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't appear in the state library system in its state of origin, no evidence it exists at all. Search on Google for name of author reveals only a facebook of a high school or undergraduate uni student with the other one on their friends list. I suspect it may have something to do with some unusual edits earlier today on the Bunbury article. (For those not knowledgeable with Western Australia, Bunbury is a small regional city and Australind and Kemerton are effectively outer suburbs.) Orderinchaos 15:43, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 00:12, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete; certainly nonnotable, probably nonexistent. Hesperian 02:58, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete; not notable at all. -- MISTER ALCOHOL  TC 03:12, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete; non-notable, fails WP:NB. –Moondyne 13:28, 2 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.