Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Titbusting


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-02 08:03Z 

Titbusting

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article cites no reliable sources, and concerns an apparently non-notable sexual activity. John254 20:41, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Good grief. --Gwern (contribs) 21:36 25 February 2007 (GMT) 21:36, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Good gief, indeed. NN, no reliable sources, reads like a violation of WP:NOR and WP:NEO.--William Thweatt Talk | Contribs 21:59, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge to Groin attack. Sounds as if it exists, but needs citation. Citation lack is not critical enough to merit deletion rather than tagging with "citation needed." Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 04:03, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy-Delete non-notable, no claim to notability, no reliable sources, no evidence for actual existence. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jeffmcneill (talk • contribs) 23:53, 1 March 2007 (UTC).
 * Delete with all haste I just spent 7 seconds of my life on that. Sigh...... Ezratrumpet 04:35, 2 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.