Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tito Mukhopadhyay


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that the subject fails to meet our notability guidelines.. Just Chilling (talk) 16:46, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Tito Mukhopadhyay

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Most sources claim his writings through Rapid Prompting Method are definitively legitimate, when that method is discredited. See Articles for deletion/Amy Sequenzia (2nd nomination) for additional similar reasons. Ylevental (talk) 12:32, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.-- Nahal (T) 12:57, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:48, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disability-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:48, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:49, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Delete I saw this come up for discussion for delete a week ago and have spent that time thinking about my vote. I had spent a lot of time cutting this article down a few years ago and what is left wasn't much. RPM and FC do not work and further discussion of it is simply a waste of time. Tito is not communicating as stated, in fact when you watch the videos of him working with his mother you can see that at times he is communicating by his actions of "bugger off". I think that Tito should be mentioned on the RPM page (as he is). His mother might warrant her own Wikipedia page as the inventor of RPM. But the "sockpuppet" of the mother should not have a Wikipedia page. I apologize if the term sockpuppet upsets you, but I can't find a better way to describe it, he is essentially used as a pointing device for his mother's delusions of communication. I was not able to find RS for Tito other than attribution that he was doing the writing. Possibly a Tito article could exist if RS in the future wrote about his situation in how he was tested and so on, in other words from the scientific perspective. Sgerbic (talk) 21:49, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment Canvassing (see bottom of this article) https://theaspergian.com/2019/07/10/fc-rpm-and-how-wikipedia-became-complicit-in-silencing-non-speaking-autistics/?fbclid=IwAR3uo3Cz4Ht27cbh3cEc9x0w1FuxajTL1euwCTOK_noNnLY1_O1nzI9MYgw Sgerbic (talk) 05:23, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:NFRINGE due to lack of skeptical sources. --Wikiman2718 (talk) 14:54, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete even if the book connected to him is notable that does not mean he is notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:32, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - I've created a stub about Soma Mukhopadhyay to which anything notable from the Tito entry can be added if Tito's page is deleted. Heepman1997 (talk) 08:47, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Seems to be somewhat notable, any rewrites should be done now, not after deletion.Slatersteven (talk) 10:10, 13 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.